Public talk: “Racialising Mortality in Early Visual Culture and the Shakespearean Stage” by Dr Farah Karim-Cooper – 3rd December 2019

“Racialising Mortality in Early Visual Culture and the Shakespearean Stage”

by Dr Farah Karim-Cooper

.

Tuesday 3rd December 2019, at 5pm, 

in the Samuel Beckett Theatre, Trinity College Dublin

 

As part of the Whitfield Visiting Lecture Series, Trinity’s School of Creative Arts and Department of Drama are proud to present Dr Farah Karim-Cooper (Head of Higher Education and Research, Shakespeare’s Globe, UK) speaking on death, race, and beauty.

tumblr_inline_n81lg4s8vr1sv7xz7

Dr Farah Karim-Cooper

Dr Karim-Cooper’s talk will focus on the representations of death that participate in the development of Renaissance ideals of beauty, virtue and racial superiority in Western Europe. It will pose questions such as: How are Early modern ideas of mortality shaped by encounters with non-white bodies and cultures? And how does Shakespearean tragedy allude to the iconographic polarities of racial distinction when staging death and dying?

Dr Karim-Cooper oversees the Higher Education programme and leads Research and scholarship at Shakespeare’s Globe. She is Visiting Research Fellow, King’s College London and co-convenes the King’s/Globe joint MA in Shakespeare Studies. She was the 2013 Lloyd Davis Visiting Professor at the University of Queensland, a Trustee of the Shakespeare Association of America and Chair of the Globe Architecture Research Group that led the research into the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse. She is frequently a keynote speaker and panellist at national and international conferences on Shakespeare, Renaissance drama, early modern culture and theatre practice. Farah curated the Shakespeare and Race Festival in August 2018. Her research interests are theatre history, feminism, critical race theory and performance. Farah is the author of Cosmetics in Shakespearean and Renaissance Drama, revised edition (EUP, 2019), The Hand on the Shakespearean Stage (Bloomsbury, 2016) and Titus Andronicus: The State of Play (Bloomsbury, 2019). She is currently working on a book on Shakespeare, Race and Death and editing The Duchess of Malfi for the Routledge Anthology of Early Modern Drama (forthcoming 2020).

Dr Karim-Cooper’s talk will be followed by the launch of Shakespeare’s Body Language: Shaming Gestures and Gender Politics on the Renaissance Stage, written by Dr Miranda Fay Thomas (Assist. Prof. in Drama, Trinity College Dublin) from 6pm in the Samuel Beckett Theatre Foyer, TCD.

MFT Shakespeares Body Lanaguage book Arden 2019


 

 

Stream the Shakespeare’s Globe production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Did you miss the live stream of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, directed by Emma Rice, last Sunday? You can now watch it on the BBC website from anywhere in the world. It will be available for six months. Let us know what you think!

p046lw7x

Review: Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare’s Globe

event_media-banner_lrg.jpg

The Taming of the Shrew, directed by Caroline Byrne for Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre, 6th August 2016

Reviewed by Emer McHugh, NUI Galway

For the last year or so, I’ve kept an eye on the programming schedules for the major theatres in the UK and Ireland for 2016. When you work on Shakespeare and Ireland in a major anniversary year such as this one – a Shakespeare 400/1916 double whammy, as you’ll have seen looking at this blog’s archives – looking at how major theatrical institutions mark these commemorations becomes of major interest. (I even had a makeshift scorecard at some point.) For example, the National Theatre are doing The Plough and the Stars; the Abbey did the same, as well as bringing Joe Dowling back to the theatre with Othello (interestingly, it was initially marketed as a ‘state of the nation’ play, a description that disappeared from the website as the run began). But, I don’t think I ever would have expected a combination of both commemorations to come from Shakespeare’s Globe. Then again, new artistic director Emma Rice continues to be full of surprises. And thus, we have Caroline Byrne’s The Taming of the Shrew, set in 1916 Ireland with an Irish cast and crew.

big.jpg

To be sure, this Shrew deals in a broad, globalised, commoditised Irishness – the musicians played their jigs and reels (strikingly reminiscent of Riverdance at times, of course) on the bodhrán, tin whistle, fiddle, and guitar for the crowd’s pleasure: all the audience needed were pints of Guinness and we’d be at a seisiún right there and then. The characters’ accents and dispositions varied from person to person, region to region: Edward MacLiam’s Petruchio was reminiscent of the Limerick comedian Tommy Tiernan, with slight Northern tones. Aaron Heffernan’s Lucentio and Imogen Doel’s Tranio sported broad Dublin accents, as did Aoife Duffin’s Kate and Genevieve Hulme-Beaman’s Bianca who were both portrayed as upper-class Dubliners. And Colm Gormley’s Hortensio also spoke in a Northern burr. Characters either wore flat caps and breeches, or looked as if they had just stepped out of a Bloomsday celebration (take Raymond Keane’s Gremio and his boater hat and suit as an example of the latter). The text was altered to add elements of Hiberno-English such as ‘Jaysus’, ‘mo chara’, and ‘go raibh mile maith agaibh’. The world of the play, too, was noticeably Irish Catholic: during her wedding, Kate sat on top of two staircases that folded together to display a neon-light cross, whereas Petruchio’s admission to Gremio that ‘me father died’ was met with numerous members of the cast blessing themselves with the sign of the cross. None of this is necessarily a criticism of the production, per se. A lot of this Irishness generated much humour from the proceedings, and certainly I found it funny given how recognisable it was to me as an Irish member of the audience. (And, so it seemed, from a lot of the audience as well.) However, given that this was performed at the Globe, and therefore for a majorly non-Irish audience, it makes me wonder whether this Irishness would manifest in the same way were it premiering at the Abbey, for Druid, or at the Lyric.

Taming-of-the-Shrew-Globe-Theatre-600x330

Production shot, Shakespeare’s Globe

Another important context to take note of is the #WakingTheFeminists movement: it’s particularly satisfying that a production set in 1916 responds to a movement born out of the response to a programme of events commemorating that same year. And generally, it’s satisfying to encounter feminist [Irish] Shakespeare on a major British stage, too. From the get-go, the production is sympathetic to Kate, and suggests that her taming by Petruchio is unnecessary and unneeded. From her spoken-word songs about how ‘the nation promised equality’, to her newspaper being ripped out of her hand by her own father, to the production refusing to shy away from the psychological and emotional abuse Petruchio subjects her to (she spends the second half in her torn wedding dress, sleeping on a bed with only Petruchio’s cowskin cape as a duvet) – this Shrew emphasises the implications of a patriarchal Irish Catholic society on the lives of women. In doing so, it does not provide easy answers: Kate delivers her final speech in resignation, anger, and frustration at the world she is forced to inhabit, and her relationship with a troubled-looking Petruchio is left up in the air. Additionally, it emphasises these women’s voices: instead of Petruchio, Kate is given the production’s final words through song, and Amy Conroy’s Widow has a much more expanded role to play: always watching, always waiting, quietly despairing at what unfolds in front of her. Throughout the production, she acts as Kate’s chain-smoking de facto feminist fairy godmother, providing unheard counsel and advice – to the point where the final scene appears to be a battle between her and Petruchio for Kate’s soul. (A Pyrrhic victory for Petruchio is implied, of course.) As Byrne comments in her programme note, ‘[i]t’s not a play about the Easter Rising, but it attempts to chime with the experience of Irish women’: Kate’s journey, and her trauma, is depicted sensitively and with nuance, and, in my view, provides a model of what feminist Shakespeare performance should look like.

It’s not unusual for Irish Shakespeare performance to respond to and to engage with the politics and issues of the here and now. If we reach back as far as 1999, Conall Morrison’s The Tempest premiered at the Abbey echoing the Good Friday Agreement a year before. Very recently, Wayne Jordan’s Twelfth Night at the Abbey acted as a response to Pantigate, a year before Ireland went to the polls on marriage equality, whereas his Romeo and Juliet at the Gate explored the ramifications of patriarchal societal structures. Shrew, whereas it may not have premiered in Ireland, speaks to particularly Irish concerns: Byrne states that ‘Irish women are still seeking equality to this day’, and this is reflected in the ongoing efforts of Lian Bell and her team to attain equality and equity in all sectors of Irish theatre, as well as the ongoing campaign to repeal the eighth amendment on abortion by many feminist campaigners (most recently seen in the Two Women Travel Twitter account and Brianna Parkins’ comments at the Rose of Tralee). Of course, I am not sure if all of this was in the mind of Globe audiences throughout the production’s run. I am also not sure if the production’s feminism was in every audience member’s mind either: judging by the ‘Kiss! Kiss! Kiss!’ chant Petruchio encourages the crowd to partake in very early on in the evening, as well as the cheering and whooping that greets a later kiss between the two. Both times, Duffin’s Kate is uncomfortable and unwilling to participate. So the next step, then, is for Byrne to bring her feminist Shakespeare to Irish audiences. If she does, I look forward to it. Her Shrew is vital, fearless, and willing to ask difficult questions.

Emer McHugh is an Irish Research Council-funded doctoral researcher and tutor at the Centre for Drama, Theatre and Performance at NUI Galway, where she researches the cultural politics of Irish Shakespeare performance in modern and contemporary Ireland. Follow her on Twitter at @emeramchugh.

Review: Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare’s Globe

This review is by Dr. Sally Barnden, who writes her own theatre reviewing blog Euston Street Diaries. Sally recently completed here PhD on Shakespeare & photography at King’s College London.

Shrew 16

Edward MacLiam as Petruchio, Aoife Duffin as Katherine. Photo credit: Marc Brenner

 

Rebellious women

 

Globe, 06.08.16, with Giulia, Nicola, Marco, and others

 In a year of multiple anniversaries, Caroline Byrne’s Taming of the Shrew stages two at once: Shakespeare celebrating his 400th death-day against the centenary of the Easter Rising. This is a striking, elegant and thought-provoking Shrew, with an excellent all-Irish cast, lengthy interludes of Irish music at the top of each half, and added songs which attempt to situate Katharine’s personal rebellion in relation to a historical political uprising. The Dublin setting is a relatively token framing gesture – mentions of Padua, Pisa and Mantua in the text go unchanged – but it is an effective collision of ideas insofar as it draws attention to the voices left behind by any given revolution. An Irish staging of this play notorious for its gender politics also seems particularly appropriate at a time when the Waking the Feminists movement has so much energy in Irish theatre.

Though its unusual setting makes this production seem on the face of it to be a different beast from other Shrews, it ultimately comes with all the same dilemmas: what do you do with a play which clearly believes itself to be a comedy, but whose cruel ending we cannot possibly celebrate? The final scene is the acid test: Katharine, formerly famed for her outspokenness and independence, lectures the other women at some length on the obedience a wife owes to her husband. We can only assume this was a desirable conclusion at the time of writing – Shakespeare and his audience must have believed that neither Katharine nor Petruchio could live happily ever after without her capitulation. The Globe’s convivial atmosphere tends to encourage productions to play for laughs, which compounds the existing issue – the space and the text both want us to accept a comic and indeed romantic understanding of Katharine and Petruchio’s relationship by the end of the play. A lot of productions have tried to recast the moment as a practical joke played by the couple on the other characters. Bolder productions play it straight, shaming the play for trying to be a comedy and shaming the audience for wanting it to be one (the most uncomfortable moment in this production is when the audience are encouraged to chant ‘kiss, kiss, kiss’ at Katherine). In this case, Katharine’s speech is sincere and exhausted; the other characters respond with growing horror as she goes on, as though realising for the first time that ‘taming’ is not particularly good joke. Naturally, given that this is the Globe, the serious mood does not prevent an exuberant jig afterwards.

The whole of the second half has an underlying bleakness to it which anticipates the finale – Kate stays in her wedding gown, which becomes more and more ragged, exposing the skeletal underskirt; the marriage bed is just a wooden frame at a precipitous angle on a heap of dirt. It’s quite a shift of tone from the first half. The shenanigans perpetrated by Bianca’s many suitors are played up with physical comedy and oversized elaborate props, including a full-sized model skeleton, an abacus, and (of course!) a globe. Lucentio enters on a scooter, beaming at the audience. The jazzy tweeds and plaids of the men’s costumes contribute to a comic mood. The surfeit of suitors makes this plot-strand work best as broad slapstick, in this case providing a foil to a much more serious treatment of the Katharine/Petruchio plot.

Aoife Duffin gives an impassioned performance as Katharine – she defiantly reads a newspaper in an early scene, unapologetically scratches her arse and picks her nose in front of her sister’s suitors, sings the interpolated ballads with enormous feeling, and gradually withers with exhaustion as the second half goes on. Amy Conroy as the widow gets a lot of laughs out of a near-silent performance, staring into the audience in indignation as the male characters casually pass around misogynist insults. All of the male servants are played by female actors – perhaps as a commentary on the play’s inbuilt assumptions about a woman’s role in marriage. Imogen Doel’s Tranio stands out – nearly every line comes with a wink at the audience and a lot of energetic clowning; the production also gets a lot of comic energy out of the size difference between her and Aaron Heffernan’s handsome but gullible Lucentio.

Shrew 16c.jpg

Aaron Heffernan as Lucentio. Production shot from Shakespeare’s Globe website

My main reservation about this production – which is partly a criticism of the whole season rather than of this show – is how little it seemed to belong in the Globe. In the first half, some of the sexist jokes were addressed directly to audience members, but as it got dark the stage lights came up, enforcing a division between stage and audience that I’ve never felt in that theatre before. The set was effective and adaptable, but it effectively boxed in the whole existing backdrop and replaced it with the kind of multi-level set that could have been seen in any indoor theatre in London. The jig and the last-night ritual of speeches and rose-tossing restored the Globe’s familiar atmosphere, but it was clear here as in Macbeth that adding more lighting and sound equipment to the Globe stage has a significant effect on the experience.

 

Report: World Shakespeare Congress

cropped-wsc2016-logo1.png

After a solid week of Shakespeare-related talks and events as part of the World Shakespeare Congress programme, it’s hard to know what to say in summation. So I’ll confine myself to the satisfyingly large but manageable topic of, you guessed it, Shakespeare & Ireland.

It wasn’t hard to find connections between Shakespeare and Ireland in 2016, as abundantly obvious from the #Shakespeare400 programme of events running throughout the year and promoted on this blog. At the Congress, Irish academics were out in force, but the Irish connection didn’t stop there. The country’s first president, Douglas Hyde, was singled out in Gordon McMullan’s opening remarks at the Globe for his contribution to Sir Israel Gollancz’s A Book of Homage to Shakespeare (recently re-issued by Oxford University Press for the 100 year anniversary). McMullan dwelt on issues of translation, citing how Hyde’s contribution in Gaelic was in parts toned down by the translators to be less overtly anti-English.

The following day saw the Irish not simply spoken about, but speaking. Director Caroline Byrne took her place alongside directors from Serbia, Nigeria and the USA for a panel on Global Shakespeare led by Tom Bird on the Globe stage. She spoke eloquently about her desire to commemorate the women of 1916 Dublin who had been ‘airbrushed out of history’, and how that informed her production of The Taming of the Shrew that has just finished its run in the Globe theatre. While Tom Bird asked her and others on the panel whether there was any post-colonial unease engendered by Shakespeare, the answer was a polite but firm ‘No’ from all corners (although Arin Arbus of Theatre for a New Audience did speak of an insecurity with the language among American actors).

 

In terms of Irish academics/academics from Irish institutions, I’m very happy to report that there were more in attendance than any one delegate could see. Shakespeare in Ireland’s own Edel Semple (UCC) led a wonderful seminar on ‘Paratheatrical Entertainments in Shakespeare’s London’ with Donald Hendricks (Kansas State University), which had Tiffany Stern as a respondent. Colleague Andrew King (UCC) was also in illustrious company, appearing on a panel alongside Helen Cooper and Hester Lees-Jeffries. From Trinity there was Ema Vyroubalová as well as her PhD student Shauna O’Brien, while Emer McHugh did NUIG proud (hopefully she will be appearing on the blog again soon with her thoughts on Caroline Byrne’s Taming of the Shrew). Maynooth’s Stephen O’Neill carried the banner of Digital Shakespeare, and Queen’s Belfast had both faculty and post-graduates in attendance, including Mark Thornton Burnett, Mia Hewitt and Matt Williamson. Your current author, Derek Dunne, was pleased to be part of a great seminar on ‘Everyday Shakespeare’, and tried in vain to keep up with congress tweets #WSCongress16 [Forgive me if I’ve left anyone out – will happily amend]

The Congress had its flaws, and a quick look at the dearth of academic tweeters in attendance (perhaps 20 regular tweeters, plus more occasional users and institutional tweets) tells you something about the delegate demographic. This is inevitably linked to the high registration fee, which did not seem to justify itself either in terms of conference swag (SAA 2016 gave every attendee a brand new book), or swanky receptions (Globe coffee breaks did not extend to biscuits). Similarly, the conference programme was by no means state of the art, with neither Table of Contents nor Index (RSA’s app this year clearly pointed the way forward in this respect, but WSC failed to follow the signs). Questions have also been raised about issues of diversity, particularly gender, as eloquently argued by Nora Williams in a recent post on her blog. One thing I cannot complain about is the marginalisation of the Irish, who were centre-stage at various points throughout.

Report: ‘Gesture on the Shakespearean Stage’ – UCD / Abbey Theatre Shakespeare

Guest post by Erin A. McCarthy.

On Friday 27th May, the Abbey Theatre hosted Dr Farah Karim-Cooper (Head of Higher Education & Research, Globe Education, and Visiting Research Fellow of King’s College London), whose talk, ‘Gesture on the Shakespearean Stage’, was the third lecture in this year’s UCD/Abbey Theatre lecture series. In order to advance the series’ goal of linking scholarship to theatrical practice, Dr Karim-Cooper was joined by actor Marty Rea, who is playing Iago in the Abbey’s current production of Othello (reviewed by Dr Edel Semple here). Rea read extended quotations from Shakespeare’s plays throughout the lecture, and while he’s always impressive on stage, it was amazing that he somehow managed to inhabit several markedly different characters while reading from a printed page and wearing street clothes.

Othello Abbey - Iago - Marty Rea

Marty Rea in rehearsal as Iago – Othello at the Abbey Theatre

The lecture comprised two main parts. The first half introduced the kinds of evidence available for the study of early modern gesture, including manuals on gesture and conduct as well as textual evidence from stage directions, textual annotation, and deictic cues, and Dr Karim-Cooper suggested that scholars’ understanding of early modern theatrical gesture has developed rapidly over the last thirty years. She then turned her focus to one specific kind of evidence, the ‘reported gesture’, or an offstage gesture described onstage by a character who witnessed the action. Attention to such gestures not only gives us a sociological perspective on how bodies could have interacted in early modern England but serve the theatrical purposes of moving plots along and highlighting broader themes.

Dr Karim-Cooper focused on reported gestures in the second half of her lecture, paying particular attention to Ophelia’s account of Hamlet’s visit to her chamber in Act II, Scene 1 of Hamlet. Hamlet’s hand gestures, Dr Karim-Cooper showed, not only wrought an emotional impact on Ophelia but also evoked iconic images of intervention, incapacitation, and dominance all at once. A brief but lively question and answer session followed, and Rea also responded to some questions about Othello.

Dr Karim-Cooper’s lecture drew upon material from her recent book, The Hand on the Shakespearean Stage: Gesture, Touch and the Spectacle of Dismemberment (Arden, 2016). The event was also recorded and will be made available as a podcast.

The UCD/Abbey Theatre lecture series, organised by Dr Jane Grogan (UCD), is now in its fifth year. This series concludes on 9th June with a conversation between UCD’s Prof Danielle Clarke and Prof Margaret Kelleher. I’ll look forward to attending future installments of this compelling lecture series in the years to come.

Guest post by Dr Erin A. McCarthy, Postdoctoral Researcher on ‘RECIRC: The Reception and Circulation of Early Modern Women’s Writing’ at the National University of Ireland Galway.

Image of The Globe from The Plays and Poems of William Shakespeare, edited by Edmund Malone (Dublin, 1794), by kind permission of UCD Library Special Collections.

Related events of interest

The final lecture in the 2016 UCD/Abbey Theatre Shakespeare lectures sees Prof. Margaret Kelleher (UCD) and Prof. Danielle Clarke (UCD) discuss ‘An “Irish Mode”? The Literary Writings and Legacy of Thomas MacDonagh’, and will be supplemented with selected readings from MacDonagh’s works performed by the UCD Ad Astra Drama Scholars. The lecture takes place on 9th June in the National Library at 7pm.

For more on Shakespeare 400 in Ireland see earlier posts on the blog and on Twitter: #ShaxIrl400 #Shakespeare400 #ShakespeareLives

Review: Measure for Measure – Globe on Screen

Review by Edel Semple

The Globe’s Measure for Measure, screened live around Ireland on May 10th, was artistic director Dominic Dromgoole’s farewell to the Globe mainstage in 2015 and what a farewell it was. I watched the play from the comfortable environs of one of Movies @ Dundrum’s smaller cinema screens. As the screening was well-attended – the Shakespeare fans responded in time with the playhouse audience and buzzed during the interval – and as the elegant décor incorporated a mock proscenium arch, the venue had a pleasing and moreover fitting theatrical ambiance.

The feeling that we were in the theatre was intensified by the improvised preamble to the play; the camera moved amongst the groundlings who looked on bemused as pimps touted their trade and prostitutes hit on unsuspecting audience members. One prostitute even dragged a customer into a brothel (a miniature hut), which cannily included a window so that we could catch glimpses of what services were on offer (the structure was later torn down, on Angelo’s orders). With Mistress Overdone and the prostitutes in gaudy makeup and over-flowing bodices, Pompey the pimp drolly commenting on the action, and the beadles dashing about like Keystone Cops, the play began as a kind of Carry On Vienna. The opening scene however, staging the Duke’s departure, brought a sober note to the proceedings.

The youthful, likeable Duke was by turns sombre and apprehensive, and hyperactive and witty. He seized Angelo enthusiastically, for instance, when the puritanical deputy entered, babbled about his plans, but then resisted the pleasantries of his subordinates to exit hastily with a grave “fare you well”. The Duke’s sudden urge to overturn Vienna’s civic morality was thus understandable as a quirk of personality, and he stood as an embodiment of this Jacobean problem play’s shifts in tone and energy.

Duke at finale - Globe’s Measure 2015

Dominic Rowan as the Duke at the finale – Globe’s Measure (2015)

In this production, Measure’s dark undertone – Vienna is in the grip of moral decay, an economic downturn, and a sexual health crisis – was treated alternately with cheerfulness and deadly seriousness. Disguised as a friar, the Duke sometimes preached hellfire and brimstone (roaring at the pregnant Julietta, for example) but more often he was bumbling and ineffectual, lackadaisically blessing anyone who passed. Arrested in Overdone’s brothel and arraigned before Escalus, the gentleman Froth ended up naked from the waist down in some hilarious physical comedy; his bare backside waving at the audience again recalled the antics of a Carry On film. Froth and Escalus then congratulated each other on how funny they both were (puns, the height of humour!), before the young gent was set free; the old boys’ network was alive and well in the city. The urban sex workers however fared much worse. During scene changes, a beadle dragged a screaming prostitute through the crowd and later we saw her branded on the face for her crimes.

Froth and Mrs Overdone - Globe Measure 2015 - from Globe twitter

Petra Massey as Mistress Overdone , with Dennis Herdman as Froth – Globe’s Measure (2015)

 

At the helm of the harsh new regime is Angelo, the Duke’s deputy. Dressed in black, Angelo was puritanical and logical, but he was wholly thrown by his sudden passion for the young novice nun, Isabella. We were reminded of the lack of the ‘fourth wall’ in the Globe and the fantastic uses its absence can be put to, when, stricken and genuinely at a loss, Angelo looked to the audience for answers asking, “The tempter or the tempted, who sins most?” After his attack on Isabella – a near rape, which he halted at the last second – the deputy naturally fell back on his status as his trump card. Prone on the floor in her novice’s shift, Isabella’s plight (“Did I tell this, who would believe me?”) was emphasised further by the swelling of a plaintive violin.

For all the moral wrangling and soul-searching of the play’s main protagonists, it was Lucio and Pompey who stole the show in this production of Measure. Lucio took nothing seriously and, it seemed, he had never had to take responsibility for anything in his life. The duty of securing Isabella’s aid was thus a new experience for the foppish man-child, and he visibly preened at being Claudio’s intimate before dashing – his signature mincing walk was endlessly comical – to the convent. Lucio’s levity – his avid gossiping, his casual groping of a nun’s breasts, his mockery of the arrested Pompey, and his derision of the absentee Duke – came to an abrupt if humorous halt when he learned of the punishment for his dissolute life. At the Duke’s announcement, no less than three women, standing amongst the groundlings, identified themselves as “wronged” by Lucio, but they speedily lowered their hands at the prospect of marrying this “lewd fellow”. If Lucio thought marrying a prostitute was a death sentence, the women affirmed that marriage to him was equally fatal.

Duke in his friar disguise and Lucio - Globe’s Measure

Dominic Rowan as the disguised Duke and Brendan O’Hea as Lucio – Globe’s Measure (2015)

Pompey Bum, the bawd with the great posterior, affected the air of a sage by leaning on his cane and dispensing wisdom learned from his observations of the average citizen. His insights were lost on Escalus, though the audience lapped up his chicanery in explaining what was done to Elbow’s wife in the brothel (whatever it was, it wasn’t done once!). Again making full use of the Globe’s space, Pompey, newly employed in the prison, picked out audience members as current prisoners and past clients of the brothel. Vienna was a corrupt city and we were all implicated in its vices.

Overdone and Pompey - Globe Measure 2015 - from Globe twitter

Petra Massey as Mistress Overdone and Trevor Fox as Pompey – Globe’s Measure (2015)

The play’s finale was thoughtfully and carefully handled. Mariana, who initially appeared like a female Orsino enthralled by love and music, had her say and delivered some punishment for her suffering by landing a hearty slap on Angelo’s face. Kneeling before the Duke, Mariana and Isabella positively oozed power. Although the women were pawns in the Duke’s scheme, this was a forceful and moving spectacle. The sight of such sororal unity also highlighted the conflict between, and moral ambiguity of, the ruling males. The Duke’s sudden proposal of marriage to Isabella was comically awkward, and he hastily turned his attention to Lucio in order to give the young novice some time to think. When the Duke proposed again, his “So…” hung and lingered, awaiting a response. Isabella was uncertain, but it was clearly her choice, and she stood to take his hand. The play’s final lines then blurred seamlessly into the beginning of the concluding dance, led by Vienna’s newest couple.

Overall, in its compelling exploration of the dualities at the heart of Measure, and its willingness to see the fun in and seriousness of the play’s moral questions, the Globe production made for a smart and engaging staging of this problem play. As suggested in a recent guest post by Kate Timperley of Arts Alliance (the distributors of Globe on Screen), these screenings are the next best thing to actually being at the Bankside theatre. Sitting in the cinema, we may not get to mingle with Mistress Overdone, Lucio, and Pompey, but with the high quality of these filmed productions we get pretty close – ladies and gentlemen, mind your purses and your morals!

 

Globe on Screen: Shakespeare from the world’s most famous stage – direct to your local cinema

Guest post by Kate Timperley

In a year full of celebrations commemorating the 400 year anniversary of Shakespeare’s death, Arts Alliance are delighted to be working with Shakespeare’s Globe to bring six thrilling, highly acclaimed productions from the world’s most famous stage to a cinema near you.

As someone completely passionate about accessibility to the arts, I am lucky enough to run the Arts Alliance Ambassador programme, a global network of arts-loving volunteers who share our passion for bringing the arts – theatre, opera, ballet, art – to as many people as possible across the world, via our screenings in cinemas. We believe there should be no barriers to experiencing the arts, not cost, not geography or any vague feeling that the arts are not for you for whatever reason. We are some 160 in number, spanning the globe – from the UK to the US, from France to Spain, from India to Denmark, and of course Ireland.

The Ambassador Network is really delighted to be working currently on spreading the word on the Globe on Screen. Seeing these stunning productions straight from the world’s most famous stage via Globe on Screen is a wonderful opportunity for everyone – students and teachers studying the work of the Bard, those that have been or go regularly to Shakespeare’s Globe and want to explore how it looks and feels in the cinema, or those that cannot make it to London for reasons of cost or geography and want to experience the magic of Shakespeare’s Globe round the corner from home for the price of a cinema ticket, and those who’ve never seen or heard much of Shakespeare before and want to use the cinema as an easy, convenient and cost-effective way in to see whether it’s for them.

We love that everyone can experience the magic of Shakespeare in the comfort of local cinema, at an affordable price, at a time that suits them. Sitting in the best seat in the house, you will be able to focus on what matters to you most – the text, the costume, the acting, the staging….or all of the above!

The first production of this year’s Globe on Screen series is that most searching exploration of sexual politics and social justice, Measure for Measure. This was outgoing Artistic Director Dominic Dromgoole’s final production in the Globe’s outdoor space, and it received rave reviews for production and acting: “Shakespeare without a safety net…it’s noisy, it’s earthy, it’s unruly…..here’s a corking good time, clear enough to make the play count, with a quite astonishing feat of acting at its heart” (Variety)

Globe on Screen - Measure

Cinema audiences react as theatre audiences – laughing, engaged, passionate, moved – and burst into spontaneous applause. In cinemas, you see things that you may have missed in the theatre – the minute, joyous details of the staging, the performances.

And what better play to dive into the details of than the thrilling Globe production of Merchant of Venice, starring Jonathan Pryce as Shylock?

Globe on Screen - Merchant

 

In some of his most highly-charged scenes, Shakespeare dramatises the competing claims of tolerance and intolerance, religious law and civil society, justice and mercy; while in the character of Shylock he created one of the most memorable outsiders in all theatre. Described by reviewers as “The Globe at its best….a finely balanced, intelligent production” (The Times), this production is returning to the Globe later this year, as well as going on an international tour. What better way to join the conversation than seeing this amazing production in your local cinema?

And what of Sir Ian McKellen’s assertion – that seeing a Shakespeare play makes the words come alive: “if you see Shakespeare on stage, much of the difficulty goes” – we want to encourage people into cinemas to challenge the perception that Shakespeare is not for them, because it is too hard, too complex, or not for them.

How about Richard II as a way in to Shakespeare? Dazzlingly eloquent and ceremonious, Richard II invests a weak and self-dramatising man with tragic status and represents Shakespeare’s most searching exploration of the meaning of kingship and the rising powers that can destroy it. A “lucid and compelling….highly intelligent and fast-moving production” (What’s On Stage), starring Charles Edwards in the title role of this often underrated history play, it feels like the most fitting production for both the Globe and for cinemas, a briskly intelligent production that gives the play exceptional variety of texture.

Globe on Screen - stage

We will shortly be announcing the second three plays in this year’s Globe on Screen series – watch this space to see which of the new productions from Shakespeare’s Globe’s new Artistic Director Emma Rice Wonder Season will be see in cinemas and brought to audiences globally.

Get involved with the conversation on social media at #GlobeOnScreen

See the trailer for this season’s trio of screenings from Shakespeare’s Globe.

Find out more and book your tickets at: onscreen.shakespearesglobe.com 

Find out more about Arts Alliance at Arts Alliance

The Globe on Screen series will be in cinemas in May and June across Ireland including at Movies@Dundrum, Movies@Swords, Movies@Gorey, SGC Dungarven, and the Pavilion Dun Laoghaire – tickets available now.

[Guest blog post written by Kate Timperley – Ambassador Network Marketing Manager for Arts Alliance]

 

Review: Hamlet, Globe to Globe

Hamlet G2G

Hamlet, Shakespeare’s Globe, dir. Dominic Dromgoole, Bill Buckhurst

Smock Alley Theatre, Matinee, Jan 2nd

As this Globe production of Hamlet reaches Ireland as the 155th stop in its global tour, you might expect a lack of freshness from the actors. The rousing, frenetic and funny Hamlet presented to Smock Alley audiences defied such expectations.

Flexibility is the name of the game with this production, as audiences are asked to accept Amanda Wilkin in a floor-length robe to be Queen Gertrude, while later transformed to a grave-digger with leather cap and mattock in hand. Indeed the same actress that matinee audiences saw as Gertrude would play Ophelia later that evening, while the lead role of Hamlet revolved from Ladi Emeruwa to Naeem Hayat. Doubtless such varying of roles helps to keep the language and action fresh for a 2 year tour, while also demanding huge variety and dexterity from the actors. For the set, packing crates remain onstage throughout, with small repositionings used to transform Elsinore’s battlements to Gertrude’s closet. Meanwhile a line of clothes hooks at the back held weapons, robes and instruments as required, which would be donned or doffed in full view of the audience for the play’s many many doublings.

The production’s overall aesthetic could be described as hipster-gypsy. Costumes sported lots of tweed waistcoats and braces, complemented by worn-out brown leather boots that really did look like they were made for walking. While not looking out of place in Smock Alley, this seemed designed to help Shakespeare blend in with his surroundings on the tour’s many far-flung appearances, from an archaeological site in Austria to Za’atari, Jordan’s Syrian refugee camp. Indeed the programme note was keen to emphasise how this was a return to the touring traditions of early modern playing, both in England and abroad.

Zaatari.jpg

Photo by Sarah Lee, photojournalist for the Guardian

Music. Never before have I seen a Hamlet so full of music. The decision to cast actors who could also hold a tune or play an instrument (standard Globe practice for touring shows) has the dual advantage of making the company more compact, while also carrying the audience gently from scene to scene. Instruments varied from the unearthly bowing of a cymbal on the ghost’s appearance to accordions and tin whistles accompanying the arrival of the players. This enlivened the 2 hour 45 minute running time, enhancing the overall folk atmosphere.

For me, the ‘tragedians of the city’ were a personal highlight. Hamlet’s play-within-a-play is well-known for its meta-theatricality, and this was given added richness in a production where the evidence of touring is never hidden from view. The makeshift curtain used for the Mousetrap had elsewhere been used to hide Claudius and Polonius during ‘To be or not to be’, and would go on to serve as the fatal arras of that ‘wretched, rash, intruding fool’. The curtain also facilitated lightning quick changes that allowed Claudius and Gertrude to double as the Player King & Queen, with Hamlet attentively observing both spectacles from the sidelines. In a trimmed-down touring production I found the choice to retain both dumbshow and spoken version intriguing, which on reflection made complete sense considering the company are so often performing for non-Anglophone audiences. And thankfully so, as the dumbshow’s melodramatic gestures and rhythmic beat had the entire audience hypnotised, leading to spontaneous applause.

smock alley Hamlet

Seated on the extreme stage-left, I was surprised with how front-facing the blocking appeared to be. When Hamlet interacted with other actors the action was fluid and dynamic, for example during the swearing scene following the ghost’s revelations. Yet for soliloquies Ladi Emeruwa frequently took up position down-stage centre, hardly turning to engage flanking audiences. In terms of focus, this felt very much like an ensemble production rather than a star-vehicle (unlike other Hamlets I could name). John Dougall was a reasonable Claudius, but to my mind was even stronger as the old ham player, acting out the Pyrrhus speech with cane in hand. The versatility of Keith Bartlett as Polonius, grave-digger, priest and soldier was admirable, while Matthew Romain’s turn as Osric stole the scene (the same actor made a great Edmund/Tom o’ Bedlam in the Globe’s previous touring production of King Lear).

In terms of text, this production favoured clarity over nuance, which is by no means a criticism. Cuts were clever and unobtrusive, while room was made for some first quarto material such as Hamlet’s advice about clowns rehearsing tired jests like ‘your beer is sour’ (with an improvised Guinness joke), and Horatio’s final instruction to let a ‘scaffold be reared up in the marketplace’. The final scene showed beautiful choreography, first for the duel between Hamlet and Laertes, and then for the transition from catastrophe to jig. Jennifer Leong’s Ophelia first raised her brother Laertes for a slow stately dance, then dancing with Keith Bartlett who had played Polonius, before resurrecting Ladi Emeruwa’s Hamlet. It had never struck me before how much Ophelia is the thread that connects all the major characters, and her interaction with each in turn was – to choose a word equally suited to early modern performance and twenty-first century touring – moving.

Review by Derek Dunne

For more on this tour see globetoglobe.shakespearesglobe.com